<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(-) HatSecurity.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hatsecurity.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hatsecurity.com</link>
	<description>../something for all Hats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Daily Telegraph website hacked</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/03/07/the-daily-telegraph-website-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/03/07/the-daily-telegraph-website-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Romanian group, HackersBlog, has struck again and this time it is not an infosec firm. It is the website of the highest selling national daily newspaper of the United Kingdom, The Daily Telegraph.
The Property section of the website suffered a serious SQL injection vulnerability which was disclosed by the group. The affected section of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Romanian group, <a href="http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/03/06/telegraphcouk-hacked-sql-injection/" target="_blank">HackersBlog</a>, has struck again and this time it is not an infosec firm. It is the website of the highest selling national daily newspaper of the United Kingdom, <a href="http://telegraph.co.uk" target="_blank">The Daily Telegraph</a>.</p>
<p>The Property section of the website suffered a serious SQL injection vulnerability which was disclosed by the group. The affected section of the website is currently offline:</p>
<div id="attachment_255" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 627px"><img class="size-full wp-image-255" title="telegraph" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/telegraph.jpg" alt="telegraph" width="617" height="296" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 1: Telegraph.co.uk&#39;s Properties section was taken offline after the compromise</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-254"></span>It is interesting to point out that despite the fact that SQL injection is the most well understood web application attack, yet many high profile websites are still vulnerable. The Property section of the telegraph.co.uk website utilized scripts that did not sanitize variable inputs properly leading to the execution of custom SQL queries by manipulating the input SQL query. The result? Well, the below pictures released by the group reveal all:</p>
<div id="attachment_256" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-256" title="telegraph_hack1" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/telegraph_hack1-300x181.jpg" alt="dd" width="300" height="181" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 2:  Database listing</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">It is very interesting to learn that the website developers did not think about hashing the subscriber passwords and instead chose to store them in plain text:</p>
<div id="attachment_258" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-258" title="telegraph_hack2" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/telegraph_hack2-300x181.jpg" alt="2" width="300" height="181" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 3: User passwords dumped in plain text</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_257" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-257" title="telegraph_hack3" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/telegraph_hack3-300x181.jpg" alt="3" width="300" height="181" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 4: Email addresses galore</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: left;">There are a lot of lessons to be learned from this disclosure. For the end-user: <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">do not</span></strong> use a common password.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Daily%20Telegraph%20website%20hacked&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2009%2F03%2F07%2Fthe-daily-telegraph-website-hacked%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/03/07/the-daily-telegraph-website-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle to issue patch for 41 security issues</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/01/12/oracle-to-issue-patch-for-41-security-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/01/12/oracle-to-issue-patch-for-41-security-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle is to release a patch tomorrow that fixes 41 security vulnerabilities across hundreds of its products. According to the announcement, the affected supported products are:



• Oracle Database 11g, version 11.1.0.6


• Oracle Database 10g Release 2, versions 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.3,  	10.2.0.4


• Oracle Database 10g, version 10.1.0.5


• Oracle Database 9i Release 2, versions 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV


• Oracle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/oracle_healthcare.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-251" title="oracle_healthcare" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/oracle_healthcare.jpg" alt="" width="112" height="83" /></a>Oracle is to release a patch tomorrow that fixes 41 security vulnerabilities across hundreds of its products. According to the <a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpujan2009.html" target="_blank">announcement</a>, the affected supported products are:</p>
<table class="texta" style="margin-left: 0.25in;" border="0" summary="Category I">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Database 11<em>g</em>, version 11.1.0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Database 10<em>g</em> Release 2, versions 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.3,  	10.2.0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Database 10<em>g</em>, version 10.1.0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Database 9<em>i</em> Release 2, versions 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Secure Backup version 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Secure Backup version 10.1.0.1, 10.1.0.2, 10.1.0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database version 7.0.5.1.0, 7.0.5.2.0,  	7.0.5.3.0, 7.0.5.4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Application Server 10<em>g</em> Release 3 (10.1.3), version  	10.1.3.3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Application Server 10<em>g</em> Release 2 (10.1.2), versions  	10.1.2.2.0, 10.1.2.3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Collaboration Suite 10<em>g</em>, version 10.1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12, version 12.0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11<em>i</em>, version 11.5.10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 10<em>g</em> Release 4, version  	10.2.0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• PeopleSoft Enterprise HRMS versions 8.9, 9.0 and 9.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• JD Edwards Tools version 8.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Server (formerly BEA WebLogic Server) 10.0 released  	through MP1, 10.3 GA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Server (formerly BEA WebLogic Server) 9.0 GA, 9.1 GA,  	9.2 released through MP3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Server (formerly BEA WebLogic Server) 8.1 released  	through SP6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Server (formerly BEA WebLogic Server) 7.0 released  	through SP7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Portal (formerly BEA WebLogic Portal) 10.0 released  	through MP1, 10.2 GA, 10.3 GA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Portal (formerly BEA WebLogic Portal) 9.2 released  	through MP3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>• Oracle WebLogic Portal (formerly BEA WebLogic Portal) 8.1 released  	through SP6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This release dwarfs <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2233696/microsoft-cuts-patches" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s one-patch fix</a> that affects Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Oracle%20to%20issue%20patch%20for%2041%20security%20issues&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2009%2F01%2F12%2Foracle-to-issue-patch-for-41-security-issues%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2009/01/12/oracle-to-issue-patch-for-41-security-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rogue Certification Authority certificates a reality</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/12/31/rogue-certification-authority-certificates-a-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/12/31/rogue-certification-authority-certificates-a-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of researchers presenting yesterday at the 25th Annual Chaos Communication Congress held in Berlin,  have successfully demonstrated an attack against X.509 digital certificates signed by a trusted Certification Authority (CA) using the MD5 hashing algorithm. The attack method makes use of MD5 collision techniques which were known to exist since 2004 but demonstrated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/securelock.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-244" title="securelock" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/securelock.jpg" alt="" width="162" height="180" /></a>A <a href="http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/" target="_blank">team of researchers</a> presenting yesterday at the <a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/" target="_blank">25th Annual Chaos Communication Congress</a> held in Berlin,  have successfully demonstrated an attack against X.509 digital certificates signed by a trusted Certification Authority (CA) using the MD5 hashing algorithm. The attack method makes use of MD5 collision techniques which were known to exist since 2004 but demonstrated in practice for the first time.</p>
<p>Read more about the details <a href="http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/" target="_blank">here. </a></p>
<p>The discovery, however, does not post a serious security risk as the technique has not been disclosed. Furthermore, most CAs are already using at least SHA-1 for the hashing function instead of MD5. The slow mover, VeriSign, <a href="https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php" target="_blank">acknowledged</a> the attack today and confirms that all certificates issued are not vulnerable to the new attack.</p>
<p>If you are still paranoid, get hold of an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Validation_Certificate" target="_blank">Extended Validation Certificate</a>.</p>
<p>Happy New Year 2009! <img src='http://hatsecurity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span id="more-243"></span></p>
<p>Update (January 2 &#8211; 10:30PM +4GMT) &#8211; A <a href="http://www.codefromthe70s.org/sslblacklist.aspx" target="_blank">Firefox plugin</a> has been released that warns users about certificate chains that utilize MD5 hash algorithm for the RSA signature.</p>
<p><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ssl-md5-block.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-248" title="ssl-md5-block" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ssl-md5-block.jpg" alt="" width="429" height="413" /></a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Rogue%20Certification%20Authority%20certificates%20a%20reality&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F12%2F31%2Frogue-certification-authority-certificates-a-reality%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/12/31/rogue-certification-authority-certificates-a-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to dump OneCare subscription model</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/11/19/microsoft-to-dump-onecare-subscription-model-offer-free-service-instead/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/11/19/microsoft-to-dump-onecare-subscription-model-offer-free-service-instead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live OneCare service never really received good reviews despite being one of the first entrants in to the retail Windows PC security marketplace with a all-in-one solution. Why not? Many reasons but primarily because it relies on products that are already available for free and does not work well with third-party programs.
Things could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/windows_live_onecare_logo.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-239" title="windows_live_onecare_logo" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/windows_live_onecare_logo.png" alt="" width="143" height="143" /></a>Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live OneCare service never really received good reviews despite being one of the first entrants in to the retail Windows PC security marketplace with a all-in-one solution. Why not? Many reasons but primarily because it relies on products that are already available for free and does not work well with third-party programs.</p>
<p>Things could change for Microsoft with the introduction of &#8220;Morro&#8221; &#8211; a free solution that Microsoft describes as &#8220;comprehensive protection from malware including viruses, spyware, rootkits and trojans&#8230;will be architected for a smaller footprint that will use fewer computing resources, making it ideal for low-bandwidth scenarios or less powerful PCs&#8221;. &#8220;Morro&#8221; would be available in the second half of 2009; Windows Live OneCare subscription service will be discontinued effective June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>According to Microsoft&#8217;s official <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2008/nov08/11-18NoCostSecurityPR.mspx" target="_blank">press release:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>“Customers around the world have told us that they need comprehensive, ongoing protection from new and existing threats, and we take that concern seriously,” said Amy Barzdukas, senior director of product management for the Online Services and Windows Division at Microsoft. “This new, no-cost offering will give us the ability to protect an even greater number of consumers, especially in markets where the growth of new PC purchases is outpaced only by the growth of malware.”</p></blockquote>
<p>It would be interesting to see how Symantec and McAfee respond to this move by Microsoft.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20to%20dump%20OneCare%20subscription%20model&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F11%2F19%2Fmicrosoft-to-dump-onecare-subscription-model-offer-free-service-instead%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/11/19/microsoft-to-dump-onecare-subscription-model-offer-free-service-instead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dodgy domain registrar de-accredited by ICANN</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/30/domain-registrar-de-accredited-by-icann-on-charges-of-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/30/domain-registrar-de-accredited-by-icann-on-charges-of-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has terminated its Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) with EstDomains.com after the President of the company was convicted for credit card fraud, money laundering and document forgery.
This comes as welcome news by the cyber security community as EstDomains.com has been used by cyber criminals for years to hide their identities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-235" title="estdomains" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/estdomains.jpg" alt="" width="211" height="64" />The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has terminated its Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) with EstDomains.com after the President of the company was convicted for credit card fraud, money laundering and document forgery.</p>
<p>This comes as welcome news by the cyber security community as EstDomains.com has been used by cyber criminals for years to hide their identities and conduct various malicious activities such as using domains for bot command &amp; control servers, drive-by downloads as well as spamming.</p>
<p>Here are some links of interest that provide more information on this story:</p>
<p>1. F-Secure Weblog - <a href="http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001522.html" target="_blank">&#8220;Case EstDomains&#8221;</a> <br />
2. The Washington Post Company &#8211; <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/10/icann_de-accredits_estdomains.html" target="_blank">&#8220;ICANN De-Accredits EstDomains for CEO&#8217;s Fraud Convictions&#8221;</a><br />
3. Notice sent to EstDomains.com by ICANN <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/burnette-to-tsastsin-28oct08-en.pdf" target="_blank">(pdf)</a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Dodgy%20domain%20registrar%20de-accredited%20by%20ICANN&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F10%2F30%2Fdomain-registrar-de-accredited-by-icann-on-charges-of-fraud%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/30/domain-registrar-de-accredited-by-icann-on-charges-of-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! fixes cross-site scripting vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/yahoo-fixes-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/yahoo-fixes-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-site scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! has fixed a cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting the HotJobs website. The vulnerability, first reported by Netcraft allowed injection of malicious code that stole session authentication cookie of Yahoo! users and submitting them to a US-based webserver. Yahoo!&#8217;s statement found on Netcraft states:
 The team was made aware of this particular Cross-Site Scripting issue yesterday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-203" title="yahoo" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/yahoo.jpg" alt="" width="141" height="33" />Yahoo! has fixed a cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting the <a href="http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">HotJobs</a> website. The vulnerability, <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/10/26/ongoing_phishing_attack_exposes_yahoo_accounts.html" target="_blank">first reported by Netcraft</a> allowed injection of malicious code that stole session authentication cookie of Yahoo! users and submitting them to a US-based webserver. Yahoo!&#8217;s <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/10/26/ongoing_phishing_attack_exposes_yahoo_accounts.html" target="_blank">statement</a> found on Netcraft states:</p>
<blockquote><p><em> The team was made aware of this particular Cross-Site Scripting issue yesterday morning (Sunday, Oct. 26) and a fix was deployed within a matter of hours. Yahoo! appreciates Netcraft&#8217;s assistance in identifying this issue.</em></p>
<p><em> As a safety precaution, we recommend users change their passwords, should they still be concerned. Users should always verify via their Sign-in Seal that they are giving their passwords to Yahoo.com.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The session authentication cookies could have been used for accessing Yahoo! services such as Yahoo! Mail and Yahoo! HotJobs amongst others.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Yahoo%21%20fixes%20cross-site%20scripting%20vulnerability&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F10%2F28%2Fyahoo-fixes-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/yahoo-fixes-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US forms task force to combat defense data leaks</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/usa-forms-task-force-to-combat-defense-data-leaks/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/usa-forms-task-force-to-combat-defense-data-leaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A special task force has been setup by the US Army to combat theft of sensitive military information stored on computer systems of private-sector contractors. The task force, Defense Industrial Base Cyber-Security Task Force, came in to being earlier this year without much noise.
According to an army document produced in August this year for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-198 alignright" style="margin-left: 3px; margin-right: 3px;" title="usarmy-logo" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/usarmy-logo2.jpg" alt="" width="118" height="150" />A special task force has been setup by the US Army to combat theft of sensitive military information stored on computer systems of private-sector contractors. The task force, Defense Industrial Base Cyber-Security Task Force, came in to being earlier this year without much noise.</p>
<p>According to an army document produced in August this year for the Pentagon&#8217;s Department for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics and first reported last week by <a href="http://www.insidedefense.com/" target="_blank">Inside Defense</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Exfiltrations of unclassified data from [military contractor computer] systems have occurred and continue to occur, potentially undermining and even neutralizing the technological advantage and combat effectiveness of the future force,&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="intelliTXT">&#8220;Current … efforts largely focus on mitigating risks of compromise to war-fighting technologies as a result of traditional espionage or industrial theft,&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span id="intelliTXT">&#8220;hostile actors can exfiltrate large volumes of unclassified program information in a single attack that can potentially net enough information to enable adversaries to narrow a capability gap.&#8221; </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Sure this initiative will bear fruit but I think more needs to be done within the Government security departments to combat potential cyber security threats. Only this week I saw Airport Security personnel hooked up on MSN.com at the Chicago O&#8217;Hare International Airport on a light day. Open Internet is a risky area for airport security personnel don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>More on the story <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/27/army-defense-task-force-targeting-hackers/" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=US%20forms%20task%20force%20to%20combat%20defense%20data%20leaks&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F10%2F28%2Fusa-forms-task-force-to-combat-defense-data-leaks%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/28/usa-forms-task-force-to-combat-defense-data-leaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK defense ministry in possible identify theft scare</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/10/uk-defense-ministry-in-possible-identify-theft/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/10/uk-defense-ministry-in-possible-identify-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identify theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN is reporting that the Ministry of Defense of the UK has lost track of a portable hard drive which according to a tabloid carries information on some 100,000 British military personnel and 600,000 potential recruits.
One can only wonder whether the information on the hard drive was encrypted or not&#8230;

    Share / [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN is <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/10/10/MOD.data.loss.ap/index.html" target="_blank">reporting</a> that the Ministry of Defense of the UK has lost track of a portable hard drive which according to a tabloid carries information on some 100,000 British military personnel and 600,000 potential recruits.</p>
<p>One can only wonder whether the information on the hard drive was encrypted or not&#8230;</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=UK%20defense%20ministry%20in%20possible%20identify%20theft%20scare&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F10%2F10%2Fuk-defense-ministry-in-possible-identify-theft%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/10/uk-defense-ministry-in-possible-identify-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Korean missile blueprints stolen?</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/02/south-korean-missile-blueprints-stolen/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/02/south-korean-missile-blueprints-stolen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data leak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[South Korea’s major newspaper, The Chosun Ilbo (Korean Daily News), is reporting that two of the country’s top defense equipment manufacturers, LIGNex1 and Hyundai Heavy Industries found malicious code on its computer systems designed to steal information.
According to the report:
LIGNex1 develops and manufactures Hyunmoo surface-to-surface missile, Haeseong ship-to-ship missile and Shingung portable ground-to-air weapons. Hyundai [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Korea’s major newspaper,<em> <a href="http://english.chosun.com" target="_blank">The Chosun Ilbo</a></em><a href="http://english.chosun.com" target="_blank"> </a>(Korean Daily News), is reporting that two of the country’s top defense equipment manufacturers, <a href="http://lignex1.com/" target="_blank">LIGNex1</a> and <a href="http://english.hhi.co.kr/" target="_blank">Hyundai Heavy Industries</a> found malicious code on its computer systems designed to steal information.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200809/200809290015.html" target="_blank">report:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>LIGNex1 develops and manufactures Hyunmoo surface-to-surface missile, Haeseong ship-to-ship missile and Shingung portable ground-to-air weapons. Hyundai Heavy Industries manufactures Haeseong, the nation&#8217;s first Aegis ship, plus destroyers and submarines for the Navy. Although the development costs of such high-tech weapons are kept secret, the construction of the King Sejong the Great-class destroyer is said to cost over W1 trillion (US$1=W1,165) and development of Haeseong ship-to-ship missile W100 billion with each missile at approximately W2 billion.</p>
<p>The National Security Research Institute, which is affiliated with the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, believes hackers have planted vicious codes through which they stolen information. &#8220;The research institute suspects the culprits are Chinese or North Korean hackers but doesn&#8217;t know specifically what information they stole,&#8221; Kim said. &#8220;In the worst case, the blueprints of missiles and Aegis ship could have been stolen.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=South%20Korean%20missile%20blueprints%20stolen%3F&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F10%2F02%2Fsouth-korean-missile-blueprints-stolen%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/10/02/south-korean-missile-blueprints-stolen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest hacker underground market going bust; what next?</title>
		<link>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/09/21/darkmarket-biggest-hacker-underground-market-bust/</link>
		<comments>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/09/21/darkmarket-biggest-hacker-underground-market-bust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identify theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatsecurity.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DarkMarket.ws, the online forum better known as the biggest hacker market for trading stolen online identities, credit card information, ATM skimmers, and a host of other related items &#8211; is shutting down Oct 4 according to a notice posted on the forum by one of the forum administrators, Splyntr.
The shut down plan follows arrest of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/darkmarket-ws.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-168" style="margin: 3px;" title="darkmarket-ws" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/darkmarket-ws.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="90" /></a>DarkMarket.ws, the online forum better known as the biggest hacker market for trading stolen online identities, credit card information, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_card_fraud#Skimming" target="_blank">ATM skimmers</a>, and a host of other related items &#8211; is shutting down Oct 4 according to a notice posted on the forum by one of the forum administrators, <em>Splyntr</em>.</p>
<p>The shut down plan follows <a href="http://www.haber7.com/haber/20080912/Enselenen-Chao-sanal-semayi-anlatti.php" target="_blank">arrest</a> of one of its administrators, <em>Cha0</em> (Cagatay Evyapan), by Turkish police earlier this month.</p>
<p>The whole story is covered in great detail this story on Wired&#8217;s Blog, <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/notorious-crime.html" target="_blank">Threat Level</a>.  So, what&#8217; next after DarkMarket.ws?</p>
<p><span id="more-166"></span></p>
<p>DarkMarket emerged after ShadowCrew.com was taken offline and I reckon it is not going to take long before another online community fills the void left by DarkMarket&#8217;s departure from the scene.</p>
<p>There are already a handful of other established online forums that cater to the needs of cyber criminals and new ones crop up all the time offering some high-value loot for those in need:</p>
<div id="attachment_170" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 272px"><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/card_fraud_1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-170" title="card_fraud_1" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/card_fraud_1-262x300.jpg" alt="Trade details by a &quot;respected&quot; underground individual on a new forum" width="262" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 1- A post on a DarkMarket wanna-be forum</p></div>
<div id="attachment_171" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/card_fraud_2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-171" title="card_fraud_2" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/card_fraud_2-300x289.jpg" alt="dfs" width="300" height="289" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 2: Same post, more details</p></div>
<p>Some of the more established forums would welcome the extra traffic that they generate from the less experienced DarkMarket users, looking for other market places to trade in:</p>
<div id="attachment_173" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fake_credit_card1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-173" title="fake_credit_card1" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fake_credit_card1-300x163.jpg" alt="asdsadsa" width="300" height="163" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 3: &quot;Real-looking&quot; credit cards packed with actual victim data are now being sold online. </p></div>
<div id="attachment_176" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fake_credit_card2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-176" title="fake_credit_card2" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fake_credit_card2-300x165.jpg" alt="dsf" width="300" height="165" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 4: They sure do look &quot;real&quot;</p></div>
<p>Indepent trading sites are likely to see a surge in their business too as some of the cyber criminals are likely to deal direct without exposing any of their information on any online forums:</p>
<div id="attachment_175" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 233px"><a href="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dumps.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-175" title="dumps" src="http://hatsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dumps-223x300.jpg" alt="sdf" width="223" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 5: One of the more &quot;reputable&quot; stolen credit card sales website. </p></div>
<p>Although none of the existing online hacker market places can truly replace the stature of DarkMarket, there is likely to be a surge in competition amongst the various online underground sites to try and reach the level of popularity that DarkMarket currently enjoys.</p>
<p>Any new community formed by the existing DarkMarket admins is likely to see stricter membership controls which probably served as the weak link for the forum; DarkMarket user-level access accounts were being retailed at competing forums privately for US$800 and above, just a couple of weeks ago.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what comes next after DarkMarket &#8211; and how the law enforcement agencies play catch-up with the notorious underground hacker market places.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=%28-%29%20HatSecurity.com&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F&amp;linkname=Biggest%20hacker%20underground%20market%20going%20bust%3B%20what%20next%3F&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fhatsecurity.com%2F2008%2F09%2F21%2Fdarkmarket-biggest-hacker-underground-market-bust%2F">Share / Save</a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hatsecurity.com/2008/09/21/darkmarket-biggest-hacker-underground-market-bust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
